Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing

NU 330 ECM

Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Item #100743128
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width

description

  • The EC design contains improvements in guiding surfaces of flanges and roller ends, which means that EC bearings have a high axial load-carrying capacity.

applications

  • Traction motors
  • Electric motors
  • Gearboxes

features

  • Improved roller-end-to-flange contact
  • Increased capacity

compliances

  • In accordance with ISO 15-1981
Limiting Speed 2000 rpm
Series 3
O.D. Type Cylindrical
Inner Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Enclosure Open
Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Capacity High Capacity
Rows of Balls Single
Tolerance Normal (PN)
Bore Type Round Bore
Full Cage Description Machined Brass Cage
Static Load Rating 965 kN
Oil Hole w/o Oil Hole
Limiting Speed - Oil 2000 rpm
Precision Ground Yes
Material Steel
I.D. 150 mm
Precision Rating ABEC 1
Radial Internal Clearance Group N
Limiting Speed - Grease 1700 rpm
Radial Internal Clearance Specification Normal Clearance
Bearing Part Complete Bearing
Bearing Design Removable Inner Ring – Straight
Heat Stabilization 302 °F
Outer Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Cage Type Solid Machined
No. of Ribs - Outer Ring 2
Bearing Type Radial
End Type Open End
Relubrication Feature Without
Cage Material Brass/Bronze
Dynamic Load Rating 176000 lbf
Static Load Rating [Max] 217000 lbf
No. of Rows 1
O.D. 320 mm
Inch/Metric Metric
Origin Cylindrical Radial
Weight 59.19 LB
EAN or UPC 7316576628481
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison