Skip to content Skip to navigation menu
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing

NU 330 ECM

Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Item #100743128
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width
Single Row Steel Cylindrical Bearing
Price Unavailable
Price Unavailable
Pricing is unavailable at this time. Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Online Ordering Restricted
Please contact Customer Service for assistance.
Contact Customer Service
    Shipment Options
  • 5.91 in Inner Diameter
  • 12.6 in Outer Diameter
  • 2.56 in Width

description

  • The EC design contains improvements in guiding surfaces of flanges and roller ends, which means that EC bearings have a high axial load-carrying capacity.

applications

  • Traction motors
  • Electric motors
  • Gearboxes

features

  • Improved roller-end-to-flange contact
  • Increased capacity

compliances

  • In accordance with ISO 15-1981
Material Steel
O.D. 320 mm
Series 3
End Type Open End
I.D. 150 mm
Cage Material Brass/Bronze
Inner Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
O.D. Type Cylindrical
Bearing Design Removable Inner Ring – Straight
Full Cage Description Machined Brass Cage
Inch/Metric Metric
No. of Rows 1
Outer Ring Width 2.56 in, 65 mm
Relubrication Feature Without
Rows of Balls Single
Origin Cylindrical Radial
Cage Type Solid Machined
Static Load Rating [Max] 217000 lbf
Bearing Part Complete Bearing
Dynamic Load Rating 176000 lbf
Heat Stabilization 302 °F
Radial Internal Clearance Specification Normal Clearance
Tolerance Normal (PN)
Static Load Rating 965 kN
Radial Internal Clearance Group N
Enclosure Open
Oil Hole w/o Oil Hole
Limiting Speed - Grease 1700 rpm
Precision Ground Yes
Capacity High Capacity
Bore Type Round Bore
Bearing Type Radial
No. of Ribs - Outer Ring 2
Limiting Speed - Oil 2000 rpm
Limiting Speed 2000 rpm
Precision Rating ABEC 1
Weight 59.19 LB
EAN or UPC 7316576628481
We're here for you
with Service Centers across the country -
We have your back
Close Compare List Open Compare List Toggle

Product Comparison